Is it ethical to expel children carrying drugs or alcohol to school

Last year, oer 1000 schoolhousechildren were suspended, excluded or expelled from New Zealand schools last year for drugs or inebriant-related offences, with the youngest sr. 8 (Stuff, 2013). The Ministry of preparation released figures showing that one In ten children who had sue taken against them in relation to substances in the year 2012, was under 12 years of age (Stuff, 2013). The Education Amendment Act has come under testing as It priorities the right to privacy of students.Effectively It means that schools would lose their authority to essay and seize narcotics and conduct random drug tests. This, m both educationalists argue, would worsen the problem. The honorable Issue that arises In this case amongst others Is whether schools should continue to retain their search and exaltation powers or should the privacy of the students be given priority as per the Education Amendment Bill. Another key issue that is begging resolution is the dilemma of whether or not, children put in in ownership of drugs and alcohol, should be expelled or excluded.Is expulsion of a child found In possession of narcotics in the best Interests of family and the child In question? It is important to also mention that since or so of the children procured the absences from a knowing or unknowing adult, should the adult be vicariously responsible for the child take responsibility and face the consequences Instead of permit the child take the fall? Is It not the responsibility of the p arnt to go out that children stay away from vices until they are old enough to judge for themselves? referable 1 OFF expulsion and attempt to provide some perspicacity into whether or not it is the best crinkle of natural process to employ. Thomas Hobbes (1651) proposed the theme that in ball club to flourish, we deprivation a peaceful, cooperative social order (Reaches & Reaches, 2010, p. 0). Hobbes goes on to say that if there were no institutions to enforce order, we would be in nocuous to do whatever we wanted. This would eventually lead to a state of everlasting(a) chaos. He has called this state of chaos the state of nature and its opposite genteel state (Reaches & Reaches, 2010).This means that in order to live harmoniously, we must protrude by a set of rules that are accepted by everyone and applies to everyone equally. Hobbes was of the cerebration that the four basic facts round human life were the reason for the globe of this social contract. He theorized firstly, that each of us requires the same basic things in order to survive, secondly, scarcity is omnipresent and we need to work hard to nurture the things we need. Third on the list is the equality of human power (united we stand, shared out we fall).Finally, there is limited altruism, which implies that we cannot assume that others will stand down when their interests contravene with ours. Since we do not learn the accepted rules of society on our own, we collapse schoolteachers and parents who amongst other things teach us how to be absorb in a socially acceptable manner. School helps us learn to build and maintain relationships. more(prenominal) or less importantly attending school empowers us with knowledge to survive in the real world. Take school out of the equation and that leaves Just parents.Now canvas the case of a young child who has gotten himself expelled for cosmos curious about his parents secret drug stash. Unable to attend school, he might not realize the difference between a Joke and a crime be stick he is unaware of right and misuse, socially acceptable and unacceptable. He whitethorn develop an insecurity employ as he probably feels befuddled and is shunned by his parents. These factors might lead him to become a criminal or worse, a drug addict. It is quite obvious that criminals and drug addicts are anti-social elements that need to be removed from the setting.It is safe to say that not all criminals are school dropouts however, most addicted to drugs throw offnt been educated about the consequences of substance shout and are helplessly addicted. The Social Contract Theory maintains that we need a social order in order to flourish. The only way to fade most of anti-social elements is to ensure that kids found in possession of drugs or alcohol remain in school to learn how to behave appropriately, and eventually get on up to become conscientious and responsible adults.The theory of utileism as verbalize by Reaches & Reaches (2010) encompasses three categories. Firstly, marchs can be Judged to be right or wrong depending on the consequences it brings about. Secondly, in terms of examining consequences, all that matters is the amount of blessedness or unhappiness the action in question creates person is more important than the other. This means that actions should be Judged as right or wrong depending on the amount of happiness or unhappiness everyone experiences as a consequence.Thus a deduction can be ma de that Utilitarian are essentially consequentialness, as they determine the ethical value establish on an answer to the question what would happen as a result of doing it? (Reaches & Reaches, 2010, p. 111). Utilitarianism is divided up into two categories namely, Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarian believe that an action must be Judged by the consequences it typefaces (Reaches & Reaches, 2010, p. 22). Rule Utilitarian believe that an action must be Judged on the consequence of the action becoming the norm that everyone lived by (Reaches & Reaches, 2010, p. 18-119). Therefore it can be said that Utilitarianism Judges actions based on whether they yield the best consequences and happiness for everyone or not. Upon application of the Utilitarian lift to the issue of expulsion, the action of excluding children who are found in possession of narcotics or alcohol would produce two possible consequences. Firstly, because the child has been expelled, he ay lose interest in st udying altogether. It is a proven fact that schools provide a protective environment that shields people from drug horror (Bell, 2013).If they are unable to stay in that protected environment forwards entering the proverbial real world there is a chance that they whitethorn be negatively influenced and resort to a life of crime, drug demoralize and other anti-social mien. The second consequence of one child caught in possession of drugs being expelled could serve as an example to the other children. This might cause them to refrain from coming in contact with drugs earning punishment.Although the second consequence appears to be feasible, as many children would benefit from one child being expelled and being made an example of, it is not guaranteed that other children will not foul up in drugs and alcohol outside school. Also, going by Rule Utilitarianism, if sack children became the norm, crime, unemployment and illiteracy rates would rise and this in turn would affect the g ood nation negatively. Therefore, Act and Rule Utilitarian would agree that dismission children found in possession of narcotics would be very unethical, as it loud cause much more unhappiness than happiness.Also, since Utilitarian believe that everyones happiness is equal, and that motives and intentions dont matter, causing unhappiness to one child and to the general population in the yearn run by expelling him from school is something they would advocate against. In conclusion, I have explored the idea of a Social Contract and the Utilitarian approach in terms of the case to determine whether or not expelling children found to be in possession of narcotics or alcohol is ethical. winning into consideration theSocial Contract, and the possible consequences of Act and Rule based Utilitarianism I have deduced that expulsion or exclusion from school is not the best course of action. In order to suit everyones interests, it is crucial that the kids remain in school where they have t he opportunity to learn about narcotics and socially acceptable behavior in a controlled and protected environment. After all, they are children, unable to constitute between right and wrong, and in this case, it is imperative that Children are the future of any country and it is our moral duty to ensure that all sections we take have their best interests at heart.